Did I ever tell you my theory of humans?

https://billiehawkins.com/everyone-here-is-so-smart-they-all-have-like-degrees-and-work-experience-and-they-all-have-that-line-you-get-from-thinking-billiehawkins-com/
Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:35:14 +0000

http://billiehawkins.com/wp/?p=32482

Did I ever tell you my theory of humans?

It is my contention that humans are created with 5 basics.
Think of it like a video race car game. When you pay your money, you get XX 'dollars' to put towards 5 categories. You can put 50 bux toward tires, but then you can't have a as powerful an engine. You can do 25$ on each, but then you have a category with 0 'something'. . . I made the same analogy to humans.


And, short of the few exceptions (who we all secretly hate anyway) in life... everyone should fit this model, and the only real adjustment is based on your opinion or preference.


So, take the following 5 aspects of a human:
1. Appeal/Looks
2. Personality/Humor
3. Intelligence
4. Muscles/Strength
5. Special Talents.
6. (Sexual) Anatomy


Each can be rated 0-5 points (5=high). Here's the kicker - you only get 20 points to apply, total.


So, for example.
A college professor in his early 30's that works out 3 times a week, drives a Lexus:
Appeal = 3 , Personality = 3, Smarts = 5, Muscles = 5, Talent = 1 Anatomy = 3 : 20 points.
So, if all you care about in the dating pool is muscles and smarts, you got a match. if you care about humor and such, he's gonna bore you.


Take any actor/actress and try it. I bet, without even knowing all the parts, you can apply the system and it will be almost completely accurate. Or, try it on yourself. Or an Ex. Or anyone you've seen naked. (I put the anatomy question last, because it's the least known property of a new person, and it's usually what's left over.)


Anyway, that's how I look at people, basically. As friends, and as mates. Although I don't care what their anatomy is from friends, curiosity is always human. In most cases, just change the chart to 4 questions, and use a 12 point scale instead. It's likely still accurate.


When i first developed the scale, I suggested that it was 4 out of 5. Instead of a rating on each category, it was a yes or no on each. That genetically speaking, evolution hasn't perfected the race, and as such virtually no one can ever be a 5 out of 5.
But, there are people out there that fit this. You know the type. Smart, funny, hot, sexy, tone/fit, and hung/stacked.


Anyway, that's my ramble for the day, take it as you wish. :)