One who lost everything, versus one who never had anything to lose in the first place... Who do you think would win? To have lost everything is to be filled with feelings of regret and anguish, but to have never held anything in the first place is to be completely empty... Like two sides of the same coin, both share the similarity of having nothing left, yet remain complete opposites. The saying, "Better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all," comes to mind, but is that really true? Is it better to live in the tragedy of truth than the wonderland of ignorance? Is there anywhere between? If a world that knew only loss was to meet its antithesis, a world where it is impossible to gain, what would happen then? I wonder, if one fate had to befall you... Which would you choose? Answer wisely, for you never know who might be listening... Kuhuhuhu...
Loss and Ignorance
10 Kudos
Comments
Displaying 3 of 3 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
piper
| || || |_
Report Comment
Nao<3
the thought process that went into this has me curious it sounds beautiful and tragic
Report Comment
lumikflash
took a few rereads but I think a world that only knows loss is the way to go. all a bunch of "Bulksweage" if you ask me tho
Report Comment
more specifically tradegy of truth over a wonderland of ignorance
by lumikflash; ; Report