Report Blog Entry
my heart is really dwelling on the fact that a lot of GC women are trying to define MtFs as a class of people that are socially acceptable targets of sexual violence. if they are actually literate on radical feminism, then thereβs no way they donβt know what theyβre doing.
but bringing this to its logical conclusion would require them to concede that we already are realistic targets of sexual violence in the first place, and that would entail abandoning their propaganda depicting us as monsters.
pumping out one toxin to push in another.
as hard a truth as it is to swallow, this is why i believe that seeing ourselves as other than women, and other than men, is essential for diagnosing this condition that threatens to rob us of our lives.
if weβre just men and thatβs all there is to it, then how come we arenβt treated like men? how come weβre being raped by men the way women are? how come weβre pornographed the way women are?
but if weβre just women and thatβs all there is to it, then how come thereβs a growing consensus among women that sexual violence against them is unforgivable, but also that sexual violence against us would be fine, or even advantageous to them?
their message that we must actually enjoy being sexually violated is a reflection of the same misogynistic rhetoric from men, that men think that deep down women must enjoy being violated. if weβre women, then how come women donβt treat us the way they treat each other? how come they treat us with the same kind of malicious bigotry, and in some cases, even sexual objectification, that they get from men?
i donβt think itβs fair, because fairness starts with the truth. and the truth is that weβre treated as though weβre beneath everyone of both sexes.Β
the only real issue of debate that ever gained so much traction this quickly within politics about it, is on how our pariah status should be RATIFIED, whether by shoving us in pornography, or in a lake of our own blood
Comments
Displaying 0 of 0 comments ( View all | Add Comment )