The hills have eyes (1977 & 2006) and wrong turn (2003) are in a toxic codependent threesome

Explain to me how you make a rip-off, off a movie, whose remake then rip-offs your rip-off. 

When I was watching 'wrong turn' (2003) today, it took me exactly until the title card started playing to realize that this was a fucking carbon copy of the hills have eyes (But with TREES now apparently) All 3 movies play out the exact same way, and 'wrong turn' doesn't even have the excuse of being a remake. It's been a bit since I've watched both 'the hills have eyes' (1977) and 'the hills have eyes' (2006), the movies kinda melted into each other in my brain, so it took me until after the movie and I was skipping through the hills have eyes movies that I realized that not everything that I originally thought to be ripped-off from 'the hills have eyes' (1977) by the 'wrong turn' actually was. Some of the details from the hills have eyes (2006) were actually ripped off from 'wrong turn'. WHY 

What kinda weird three way copying competition is going on around here? We don't need the same movie 3 fucking times. AND WRONG TURN HAS 8 SEQUELS. 8 SEQUELS OF WHAT? THE SAME MOVIE AGAIN? I am NOT watching that shit bro. 

The hills have eyes was better than wrong turn too, AND it only got one sequel each, so yeah something's def not right here