Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman define trust as:
“The willingness of a party to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor.”
In simple terms: trust = being willing to take a risk because you believe the other person won’t let you down.
I. The Core Structure of the Model
The model explains trust using three main elements:
1. Trustor (the one who trusts)
This is the person who decides whether or not to trust someone (e.g., an employee, manager, or colleague).
The trustor has a propensity to trust
→ a personality trait shaped by experience, culture, and past relationships
→ some people trust easily, others are more cautious
2. Trustee (the one being trusted)
Trust depends largely on how trustworthy the trustee appears. The model identifies three key factors:
Ability
Skills, competence, and expertise
“Can this person actually do the job?”
Benevolence
The extent to which the trustee genuinely cares about the trustor
“Do they have good intentions toward me?”
Integrity
Adherence to principles the trustor finds acceptable (honesty, fairness, consistency)
“Do they do what they say they will do?”
Together, these three form perceived trustworthiness.
3. Trust → Risk-Taking in the Relationship
When trust is high, the trustor becomes willing to take risks
Examples in organizations:
Sharing sensitive information
Delegating important tasks
Accepting decisions without monitoring
Trust does not mean risk disappears, rather it means the person accepts vulnerability.
II. Outcomes and Feedback Loop
The results of risk-taking behaviors influence future trust
Positive outcomes → trust increases
Negative outcomes → trust decreases
This creates a dynamic loop where trust evolves over time.
III. Simple Visual Summary (for a blog)
Propensity to Trust
↓
Perceived Trustworthiness
(Ability + Benevolence + Integrity)
↓
Trust
↓
Risk-Taking Behavior
↓
Outcomes
↺ (feeds back into trust)
IV. Why This Model Is Still Important
Widely used in organizational behavior, leadership, and HR research
Helps explain:
Manager–employee trust
Leadership effectiveness
Team performance
Emphasizes that trust is both rational and emotional
V. One-Sentence Blog-Friendly Summary
Trust in organizations emerges when individuals believe others are competent, well-intentioned, and principled and are therefore willing to accept vulnerability.
Comments
Displaying 2 of 2 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
#Haytaaslan#
cool
edith
amazing continue posting