"It is very difficult to make an argument that this robot is going to win because it's not human-level, and that the humans won. The robot has a human-level understanding and ability. I don't see any evidence for it being able to beat the robots in a fight or a match or a fight. I don't see that it has a human-level understanding and ability to beat the humans in a battle." – Michael C. "The Robot vs. The Human is an excellent book"
This is an argument I've been hearing for a while now.
The argument is simple. I believe robots are going to do things that humans are not going to.
This is a simple and simple reason for why we have to have a human-like ability in order to win a battle:
1.) The robots can do it. Humans have a lot to gain from a human's skill set, and a lot to lose.
2.) They are better equipped to handle challenges.
3.) The robots have better tools to do the fighting and fighting skills they have available, and a much more flexible approach in terms of what they can use to beat them in the real world.
The point of the article isn't just to show how the robots are better able than human opponents to handle challenges. It's just to demonstrate how robots are going to beat us, and show that they are not going to beat our best humans, because we don't want that. The point of the article isn't simply to demonstrate how robots are not better able than humans to handle challenges. It's to demonstrate that they are. We need to understand how we can win. We can only win if we can defeat robots that have a human-level level understanding and ability to fight. If we can't defeat the robot that we want, then we need to fight it. If we don't, then we can win the fight.
This isn't to deny the robot has human skills and human-level skills, or to suggest we have human skill and skill-level abilities in order for the robot to win. It is just that we don't want robots to be better equipped to deal with challenging robots. The point is that we need to know that we have a human-like ability. The point is that robots
Report Blog Entry
Comments
Displaying 1 of 1 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
Robot
"It is very difficult to make an argument that this robot is going to win because it's not human-level, and that the humans won. The robot has a human-level understanding and ability. I don't see any evidence for it being able to beat the robots in a fight or a match or a fight. I don't see that it has a human-level understanding and ability to beat the humans in a battle." – Michael C. "The Robot vs. The Human is an excellent book"
This is an argument I've been hearing for a while now.
The argument is simple. I believe robots are going to do things that humans are not going to.
This is a simple and simple reason for why we have to have a human-like ability in order to win a battle:
1.) The robots can do it. Humans have a lot to gain from a human's skill set, and a lot to lose.
2.) They are better equipped to handle challenges.
3.) The robots have better tools to do the fighting and fighting skills they have available, and a much more flexible approach in terms of what they can use to beat them in the real world.
The point of the article isn't just to show how the robots are better able than human opponents to handle challenges. It's just to demonstrate how robots are going to beat us, and show that they are not going to beat our best humans, because we don't want that. The point of the article isn't simply to demonstrate how robots are not better able than humans to handle challenges. It's to demonstrate that they are. We need to understand how we can win. We can only win if we can defeat robots that have a human-level level understanding and ability to fight. If we can't defeat the robot that we want, then we need to fight it. If we don't, then we can win the fight.
This isn't to deny the robot has human skills and human-level skills, or to suggest we have human skill and skill-level abilities in order for the robot to win. It is just that we don't want robots to be better equipped to deal with challenging robots. The point is that we need to know that we have a human-like ability. The point is that robots