Report Blog Entry
Alright let's get things straight. I do not support AI art or AI replacing humans in creative occupations, nor will I ever. My point is that we shouldn't neccessarily blame AI itself so much but instead the blame should be shifted more towards the people who use AI for less than acceptable use cases.
If I didn't make much sense, sorry about that;
If you think I'm wrong, tell me I'd actually like to hear it;
and sorry if I offended you
Comments
Displaying 2 of 2 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
carlosfruitcup
AI should've stayed as chatbots, as soon as it began generating images, music, art, etc thats when it went downhill for me
kennedy
totally see where you're coming from. I think the problem with AI - and why we see people "blaming AI" as opposed to blaming the people creating/using it - is that it has developed so rapidly and is soooo lucrative that it's hard to set guidelines for ethical use. for example, legislation that might outline more clearly what is or isn't okay (i.e. is using multiple voice actors' work to create a "new voice" theft?) hasn't had the time to develop. it feels like the industry is in a losing battle in containing these issues because new moral dilemmas pop up before yesterday's was even addressed. it definitely has to do with how AI is used, at the end of the day, but it just sucks that it has capabilities that lend itself to exploitation at the hands of those that are greedy, lazy, or even just indifferent.
tldr: it's impossible to make something so easy to use for "less than acceptable" reasons and expect it not to be exploited for such.
by kennedy; ; Report