blog 008 - freedom? that exists?

Although freedom is a responsibility, sometimes the person who possesses it has the morbid curiosity to know how far it could go. I am curious that many people are misguided by this type of pleasure, and I speak with a voice that in a certain way does not have it; clearly I have my rights and values but I refer to political and social issues that overshadow that. To give an example (which is not my case) being a middle class person who comes from and lives in a country in dictatorship, clearly you try to live as comfortable as possible to achieve "humanly" survival, but there is also the reality that there could be a future where everything costs a lot. I think that would include the mentality that the person has, because they live different aspects; entities with family, lonely, with disabilities both physical and mental, among many more that could test their survival with the condition that sustains their shadow.

---

---

But retaking the vanished freedom is something very sought after, but I think that it is never possessed. Even if you feel free, you will still be condemned to something that perpetuates different pathologies that retake the conscience of having an overweight that somehow frees you, with a future that maybe you will return to "depend" on something that points to an unbridled emptiness. Freedom, the material desire to get out of uniformity. This thing, like any other, has existed since human beings developed diverse mentalities and began to condemn others. One could include landowners, presidents, kings; superior entities (perhaps celestial) who had the skill to lay down individuals they saw as minorities, which they are and many of us are, but to clarify what was the need to enslave black people? Racist things are ridiculous. The holocaust, which committed genocide to countless Jews, simply to cleanse a society that was to be reborn, there is no logistics to carry out such a feat.

Certainly ideology, as a factor of this type of catastrophes that affect societies and social classes is very confusing to finish understanding them, we are from another era, and maybe they wanted to eliminate "evil" or what was wrong, being them the main catastrophic entities, ignoring human rights to fulfill worldly whims. Trump, Hitler, Hussein, all those heads lead to the same destiny. Erasing efforts of ancestors who liberated countries, their regions; abolishing precarious, to be in vain in this present, in their ancient tomorrow.

---

But this is not about people with mastery. Does hope affect the vision of a "next" freedom"? Obviously it is something that has its roots, both are self-destructive, which from a completely responsible point of view, is something that carries with it the weakening of emotional states, which can tear the feelings of people who need it a supreme freedom. Knowing that there could be the possibility of deplorable situations of the individual. A desire for an open road that is obscured by the actions of something that is not their responsibility. Emily Dickinson saw sugar in her eyes and felt it on her tongue: "Hope” is the thing with feathers - That perches in the soul - And sings the tune without the words - And never stops - at all -" that vision of a "bird" perched in the soul, is it really there? Or is singing simply something that stuns during a process of exile, so that a person can transition from a state of precariousness to an objectively better one?

---

Now, if you are "free" are you satisfied? First of all, I don't mean that being a slave to something is relatively good. There is a portion of the population that feels a dependency for damages previously suffered. The dependence that something is missing, when the individual is already in a state of total normality is consecutively pursued by thoughts of pressure for the lack of what is clearly missing. "I am free and that is why I am lost" here Kafka reflects, confronting existentialism. Arguing that the alternative of freedom can generate confusion by overcoming past situations where confusion dwells in that lagoon. With the simple fact of having gone ahead, it is only you against the world; with the destiny of independence that you must write, Kafka perhaps only wanted to be adrift to maintain the balance he so desired.

I repeat, with this I do not support the idea that being free is a risk and that condemnation is our daily life. My conclusion with this is that freedom as a complex concept is very arduous and multidimensional, that it has direct impacts with very essential senses for the soul. It is a very difficult thing to obtain, we do not know how it will arrive and if it will really be effective to really affirm if we will really be purified to transcend.

---