St. Cyril of Alexandria
Examination of Letter 45
To Succensus, Cyril writes.
For a bit of background, Succensus and his colleagues were being accused of
being followers of Apollinaris, as they had been stating there was one nature in Christ,
the only begotten. Succensus writes to Cyril asking whether or not it is proper to say
two natures in Christ, considering how they know that it is proper to say two natures
of Christ. Succensus wrote to Cyril these words:
“I and all our clerics who love Christ have judged that an examination of these
statements should be sought from your holiness… If you profess one nature like Apollinaris
about Christ and not two, that is divine and human, perhaps you teach this using the formula
‘after the union’, and affirm one nature because the mixture and confusion of the two natures
of Christ have occurred and you now consider him to be one of the two..”
Cyril, not wanting to be also accused of confessing the same heresy as
Apollinaris, who confuses the natures, writes back to them. Here St. Cyril of
Alexandria writes in Par. 2:
“But since your excellency is inquiring whether it is proper to speak of two natures in
Christ or not, I thought I ought to speak on this matter.”
Cyril had continued later in Par. 6 wanting to make his beliefs clear, and not
like those of Heretic Apollinaris, writes once more:
“Considering, therefore as I said, the manner of his Incarnation we see that his two
natures came together with each other in an indissoluble union, without blending, without
change, for his flesh is flesh and not divinity, even though his flesh became the flesh of God,
and likewise the Word also is God and not flesh, even though he made the flesh his own
according to dispensation. Therefore, whenever we have these thoughts in no way do we
harm the joining into a unity by saying that he was of two natures, but after the union we do
not separate the natures from one another, nor do we cut the one and indivisible Son into two
sons, but we say that there is one Son, and as the holy Fathers have said, that there is one
physis of the Word [of God] made flesh.”
Comments
Displaying 0 of 0 comments ( View all | Add Comment )