“time is limited” and i know thats probably in a metaphorical sense of ins some other way. i dont think time is limited but its a limitation to the things around is
time itself is eternal and can never break its always a constant
time puts some balance to the life of the things around us because first we need a beginning a midle and an end. we could say without time things would be everlasting and it would never have balance because it would never end and its “time” will never come, but then if time never existed nothing would exist. because the beginning of something is like. time right?without a beginning or middle then there is no end there is nothing. eternal is without a beginning but time kinda measures it
beginning is the start of something, middle is like "during" moment, and the end is when it just stops living. without a beginning, when it ends just like that, there would be no middle or end because there is no start. but if there were no beginning or end, we get middle left. i'm pretty sure that's the definition of eternal. since eternal is defined by something that has no birth or death; it just remains a constant forever. when there is a beginning and a middle yet no end, that would define everlasting because everlasting has a beginning, but continues to live forever
what if there's no beginning or a middle? end. that's it like, you never became something you're just gone
Comments
Displaying 0 of 0 comments ( View all | Add Comment )