I Hate Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp is an absolute scum bag, here is why. feel free to debate in the comments.

As we all know, Depp was in a court battle with his ex wife, Amber Heard at the Fairfax County in Virginia for a defamation case against Heard from April 2022 - June 2022,

People claimed that Heard had faked stories and evidence about Depp physically assaulting her and soon became a meme for the "my dog stepped on a bee" incident, but lets look closer.Β 

Before all of this occurred, Depp and Heard had a different court case back in theΒ  UK, where Heard actually won the abuse case... So lets think.Β 

Johnny Depp is a very old man (much older than Heard and other past lovers), and a young woman just publically outed him for being an abuser. His ego was bruised - so what do fat little insecure men do? They fuck withΒ  you as much as they possibly can. They would spray Depp's cologne in the bathroom stalls Heard was using to purposely trigger her (which doesn't sound very innocent to me!), he wouldn't look at her, which is so dehumanizing,, AND there were messages between him and Marilyn Manson, another known abuser, talking about disgusting things he'd do to amber - and it got played off as a joke??? ur kidding.

An article from BBC News in 2022 said;Β 

Β In both the UK and the US trial, Mr Depp's lawyers argued that Ms Heard was lying - to make their case, they attacked her character and claimed that she was in fact the abusive partner.
This is a common defence tactic in sexual assault and domestic violence trials called "deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender" or "Darvo", said Mr Stephens.
The strategy turns the tables on the alleged victim, shifting the conversation away from "did the accused commit abuse" to "is the alleged victim believable".
"They deny that they did anything, they deny they're the real perpetrator, and they attack the credibility of the individual calling out the abuse, and then reverse the roles of the victim and the offender," Mr Stephens said.
In the UK trial, Mr Stephens said the judge recognised that strategy, and dismissed a lot of the evidence that did not directly address whether Mr Depp committed assault or not.
"Lawyers and judges tend not to fall for it, but it's very, very effective against juries," he said. Men are more likely to believe Darvo arguments, but female jurors are also susceptible.
"People have a paradigm in their mind of how a victim of abuse might be like and how they might behave, and of course we all know that's often false."
Hadley Freeman, a Guardian journalist who covered both cases, told the BBC that another major difference was the fact that the American trial was televised, turning the court case into "almost a sports game".


0 Kudos

Comments

Displaying 0 of 0 comments ( View all | Add Comment )