These words are not just a call to reject oppression, but a challenge to the structures that have always sought to impose their will on others. Imperialism, in its many forms, is a persistent force—a belief that power gives the right to dominate, to subjugate, to erase the autonomy of others. It is an ancient impulse, but one that is still alive in the modern world, where the reach of empires is measured in military presence, economic influence, and political manipulation.
At its core, imperialism is the denial of self-determination. It says that some are entitled to decide the fate of others, that borders are negotiable when convenience or desire demands it. It treats nations, peoples, and cultures as mere pawns to be moved, consumed, and controlled. And when imperialism shows its face, it brings with it the crushing weight of tyranny—the force of a system that denies people the freedom to make choices about their own lives, to speak their own truth, to live with dignity.
In the struggle against imperialism, there is always a refusal to accept this narrative. There is the recognition that no one, no matter how powerful, has the right to impose their will on another. Whether through violence, manipulation, or economic control, imperialism seeks to strip away the very essence of what it means to be free. But freedom cannot be stolen—it can only be suppressed temporarily, because those who stand against it will not be silenced.
This is the essence of resistance: the belief that every person, every community, has the right to live without fear of domination. The belief that, no matter the odds, no empire, no tyrant can ever fully erase the will of a people who refuse to be enslaved. The struggle against imperialism is the struggle for sovereignty, for the right to determine one’s own future.
Comments
Displaying 1 of 1 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
francis, fran
this is great i love this, but for the sake of conversation, i will play the historian...
don't you think that one of the natural consequences of self-determination is the formation of an empire? how does a civilization continue growing for multiple centuries without fragmenting into smaller ones? they must develop governments with dominant ideals... when these bump into others, there is bloodshed. but there's also syncretism and eventually the acceptance of 'them' as 'us.'
and that empires aren't really colored all black... they've been the most stable form of political organization for the longest time. not that this justifies the bloodshed and oppression which imperialism relies on, but it might show that they've been popular for a reason. and it's not just because their founders are elitists with naive entitlements. empires resist famines, invasions, riots, any extreme and sudden changes... this isn't necessarily advantageous, but history favors that which is most resistant.
just trying to say that empires don't just exist because powerful humans are evil. they exist because they are the practical result of large civilizations, and they tend to bring some cool things like syncretism, security, and over the course of centuries, equalization between the conquered and the conqueror. i can elaborate more with historical examples but i think i've overstayed my welcome as it is
i apologize first for the late response, i accidentally deleted the blog comment notification because spacehey is really slow and i wanted the website to speed up a bit on my pc.
i also appreciate your response and the historical perspective you bring. you are right that empires have historically been a natural consequence of human organization, often providing stability for long periods. however, i think the core issue isn’t just the inevitability of power structures but rather the way they operate. whether through coercion, suppression, or domination.
but you are well spoken nonetheless king.
by enigma; ; Report