Before you start reading...

Hello and welcome to my new post discussing philosophy and art. Keep in mind that I've translated this on Google Translate and that it may have some grammatical errors or it would sound unnatural; since all my original research texts are in Serbian. And if you find anything that isn't true or something missing in this blog post, please let me know in the comments, I would appreciate it very much! And now, without further ado, enjoy reading.

Different types of art

Artists deal with philosophical topics in a very serious way (love, wisdom, philosophy, god, death, etc.):

• Painting
• Literature - some writers also wrote philosophical essays, and some philosophers were also involved in literature
• Cinematography
• Music
• Architecture
• Sculpture

etc...

How do art and philosophy work together?

Art and philosophy share a deep and intricate relationship, intertwining the realms of thought and visual expression. At the base of this connection lies the exploration of deep concepts, the examination of the mysteries of existence, truth and beauty through the language of creativity.

How does art interfere with philosophy?

Plato was one of the opponents of art. He claimed that art only imitates reality instead of explaining it, and by imitation it distracts us from the essence. This criticism of Plato affects only the so-called mimetic or supporting arts. Despite the radical criticism of art, Plato's dialogues are brilliant works of ancient literature.

In addition to Plato's criticism, this question could be answered with several other criticisms that try to oppose art.

Different approaches to the truth. Philosophy strives for analysis and systematic investigation of truth. Art, on the other hand, often uses metaphors, symbols, and emotions to express deep truths about the human experience. This different approach to the truth can lead to misunderstandings and even conflicts.

Subjectivity VS objectivity. Art is often very subjective and open to different interpretations. Philosophy, although it can also be inspired by subjective experience, strives for objectivity and universal truths. This difference in approach may lead philosophers to regard art as obscuring clarity of thought.

The challenge of rationality. Art often evokes our emotions and intuition, which can be at odds with the rational approach of philosophy. Some philosophers believed that art could lead people away from rational thinking and towards irrationality.

Although these three criticisms may be true in some way, they are again refuted by the following arguments:

• Many philosophers were inspired by art for their thoughts. For example, Plato often used myths and allegories to illustrate his ideas.
• Art allows us to experience the world on a deeper level and to gain new knowledge about ourselves and others.
• Instead of being seen as opposites, art and philosophy can be seen as complementary disciplines that enrich each other. Art can give philosophy vividness and concreteness, while philosophy can help to better understand art.

Therefore, art does not have to interfere with philosophy if art is its source of inspiration and a new way of thinking.

Aristotle on art

Aristotle emphasizes the ability of a work of art to induce purification or catharsis.

Catharsis is a state in which our feelings are purified, and the realization of sublime ideas becomes close. Aristotle developed the doctrine of catharsis in his "Poetics", especially when he talks about tragedy.

Tragedy evokes strong feelings that initiate catharsis.

Philosophy of art and Aesthetics

Philosophy of art is a philosophical discipline that asks questions about art (What makes a work artistic? Where does an artist's inspiration come from?)

Although the object of aesthetics can sometimes be non-artistic beauty (natural beauty), it is most often associated with the beauty of a work of art.

The relationship between the philosophy of art and aesthetics

Similarities:

• Both disciplines deal with the study of art and artistic experience. They are interested in what constitutes art, how we perceive art, what is the role of art in our life and society.
• Both disciplines use analytical and interpretive methods to investigate these questions.

Differences:

• Philosophy of art broadens the focus on art as a whole, including its nature, function, value and relationship to other areas of life. While aesthetics has a narrower focus on beauty and aesthetic experience, although it also deals with other aspects of art.
• Philosophy of art asks fundamental questions about art, such as: What is a work of art? How does meaning arise in art? While aesthetics deals more with issues related to the perception of beauty, the nature of beauty and the aesthetic experience.
• Philosophy of art often uses conceptual analysis and argumentation to reach a conclusion. While aesthetics can also use empirical methods, such as experiments, to investigate aesthetic experiences.

---

Small update: I also made a website on Neocities about philosophy, so please check it out!