Random gross thought I had

Hey so what’s worse? Painting with blood or painting with sh*t? Like, poo is smelly and gross and why tf would you paint with it? But turns out some people have painted with their own excrement and watercolours. Like ewwwwwww. 

This thought was sparked because the other day, on tt i was just doom scrolling and i saw a slide show of someone showing off their art, it was cool art but on the last slide it looked like they used their own doo doo to paint some of the stuff on it, like wtf?

And then there is blood. I think blood is more accepted as being used to paint because quite a few people have done it before. Like I’ve painted with my own blood once, but that was because i had a nose bleed and it bled onto the thing i was drawing so i was like, oh well, and used to for some of the shading and details. I showed my art teacher and he thought it was really cool, and in fact encorraged me to paint with more blood, but instead of my own, i go to the butchers instead and ask for a bag of it or smith…

I guess doo doo is more gross to paint with and blood is more concerning to paint with


4 Kudos

Comments

Displaying 1 of 1 comments ( View all | Add Comment )

Pity

Pity's profile picture

Yeah I think painting with your own waste is worse, its just generally more unsanitary and I think inspires a more uneasy reaction in people right off the bat. Blood is just also kinda cool and can be very pretty circumstantially, poo is just poo.


Report Comment