Report Blog Entry
Our meat insudtry is so fucked up, we can even buy a steak from a grocery store without supporting horrible and painful execution machines. Animals deserve to live a life as well, if we didn't eat them they would just be another strange animal on display at a zoo. Who decided some species should be praised and some should be culled?
So obviously the only solution to this problem is cannibalism. We already have so many death row inmates that would make a plethora of meals for families all across America! Why just let their dead bodies take up space when they could be of use to people even after death?
Did you know the British ate the magority of mummified humans? There were so many more mummies before they came along and ate them, made paint from their bodies, ect. But maybe they were right! Who cares if a few bodies that have been buried and forgotten about long ago just so happen to feed a starving child? It would certainly help the overpopulation crisis because graveyards wouldn't take up so much nessasary space!
Comments
Displaying 2 of 2 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
Zuri/Jim/Null<33
the British never actually ate mummies!! it's true that egyptomania was a thing for a while in the XIX century, and that hosting mummy unwrapping parties was quite fashionable, but they Did Not Eat Them!! only passed around some of their bones/the amulets some mummies were wrapped up with. mummification itself involves processes that would render any meat inedible ╹▽╹ the practice of eating enbalmed bodies(including parts of mummies) did exist from the XV century up to around that point, but it was mostly medical/spiritual in nature and Could Not Keep Someone From Starving!! plus the people who couldn't afford food most likely couldn't afford a mummy either ◕ v ◕ they did sell illegally exhumed bodies sometimes tho so this might be what you meant? sorry if this seems rude hsjshsk I just wanted to mention some of this stuff. also there is a big difference between eating a humenly(to whatever extent that is even possible) slaughtered animal vs the corpse of An Actual Person.
Niko
fine i get what ur saying but theres a difference between an animal and a human being
an animal is an animal it cant think beyond just surviving and reproducing while a human is capable of sooo much more
slaughterhouses have standards so they make sure that no animal is getting tortured, ik there isnt such a thing as humane killing (unless its mercy killing but thats arguable) but still
i think the more important thing would be how domestic animals are raised or if there genuinenly sick ppl abuse them, animals rights exist after all