Report Blog Entry
------------------------ INTRODUCTION ------------------------
Typology personality refers to the classification of personality based on traits, behaviors, cognitive processes, and recurring patterns. And than they would be grouped into categories or "types" (e.g., INTJ, sp2w3) that share common features. It is not intended to capture the entirety of one’s personality, and each typology system categorizes and interprets these aspects of personality differently. I would try to explain a few systems in the future (⌯¤̴̶̷̀ω¤̴̶̷́)✧
Much like various branches of psychology, typology seeks to understand mental processes, personality traits, and behavior patterns. However, it often lacks the scientific rigor required to be considered a validated science, which leads it to be labeled as pseudoscience. While typology may not meet strict empirical standards, this does not render it useless; it offers a framework rather than definitive answers.
---------------- ☆ The Name of Each Systems and My Types
☆Jungian: IF(N)
☆Socionics: EII
☆MBTI: INFP
☆Enneagram: sp/so6w5
The core type: [6];
Subtype: [w]ing 5;
Subtype: [s]ocial [p]erserving; [so]cial; [sx]eual.
- Trifix: sp/so6w5-sx/sp9w1-so4
☆Psychosophy: LEVF
☆Temporitics: NEFP
☆Tempraments: Mel-Phel-Sang
You could research the systems by googling the name! I have a plan to share my resources soon(☞ﾟ∀ﾟ)☞
—————————————————————————————————
Comments
Displaying 1 of 1 comments ( View all | Add Comment )
LuciLucilia
My Enneagram tri-fix is SX/SP 4w5, 5w4, 1w9. Enneagram is honestly my favorite of the personality typologies. Not entirely sure why this is, I think maybe, from a Jungian point of view, its because the Enneagram's typological positions are less functional and more archetypal? Ultimately, probably still not true in the capital t "True" sense, but contains a lot of archetypal wisdom.
Nice, I agree! Ennegram is also a system I like, they have more personal touch and feel less mechanical I think.
Your type is pretty intense, I see (*◡*♡)
by Evanescence, The Blue Lotus; ; Report
Yess, exactly its less mechanical and is a lot more archetypal or intuitive I feel, and in that way ironically feels more accurate.
I've struggled to type myself with functions since I seem to use a lot of Ti and Fi... though if I had to guess I would probably say im an INFP, I dunno though. Sometimes I also seem to use Ni so really I don't know.
Also yes hehe, it is kinda intense, though I feel like my profile displays as muchhh
by LuciLucilia; ; Report