catreadingabook's profile picture

Published by

published
updated

Category: Blogging

Specialization

This will end up being the first ever personal blog post I have ever written, so perhaps that’s some cause for celebration, or perhaps misery, or perhaps indifference, I guess only time will tell. 


Considering this is a ‘personal’ blog, it would make sense to say something of my ‘person’, so perhaps a good way of doing that would be to talk about my day up to this point. 


Well, I started today off by running, that was pretty fun, it was foggy out so I had to stop every couple minutes or so to wipe my glasses off, although looking back perhaps that was just an excuse so I could catch my breath, that’s always been a bad habit of mine, stopping while running that is. You’d think eventually your lungs would like, I don’t know, grow stronger or something, like every other muscle does, but so far that doesn’t seem to be the case. Oh well. During the run an old man stopped me and told me that I had to work out both sides of my legs, and in order to do that, I should try running up hills backwards. Perhaps I will try that. 


The rest of the day is boring so I’ll spare the details. I went book shopping, then I went regular shopping, then I went on a walk and now I’m here. 


In the short time it took me to write a description of my day I’m beginning to suspect my personal life is not nearly so interesting as to warrant writing a personal blog (today was one of the more exciting days in this past week), so, in order to alleviate this I’ll try writing about something a little more general. 


Whilst running and walking today I was turning over and over in my head an idea I had read of in Wendell Berry's collection of essays called The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture, namely, this idea he's threaded through all of the essays I’ve read so far of ‘specialization’. Berry characterizes this tendency towards specialization we see nowadays as a ‘disease of the modern character’, and he provides ample reasons for why he thinks this is the case.


Firstly, what does he mean by ‘specialization'? Well, he means something like the almost narcissistic tendency of modern life and education to corner people into doing one thing, at the expense of losing care for things not in one's sphere of experience. This is of course in opposition to the ‘generalist’, or someone who takes a concern in things much broader than themselves, perhaps at the cost of less self actualization and resources to do what they personally want, but with the benefit of promoting the good of the whole. 


In the past the concept of a ‘specialist’ was unthinkable, but nowadays, where people don’t have to provide their own food, shelter, etc., it makes sense to focus more of your efforts on one thing you’re good at or are fond of, as all of your basic needs are already met. This sounds good on paper, but according to Berry, it really isn’t. 


Why? Well, specialization inevitably leads to something of a disconnect between all the various spheres of life. For instance, a salesman has no concern on what sort of effect whatever device he’s selling has on the environment, a consumer cares not what it took to get food on his or her plate, they only care that it’s there. 


This disconnect naturally leads to an apathy towards all things which aren’t in our immediate awareness. There suddenly arises an unscalable wall between, let’s use Berry’s example, a scenic view and the viewer who views it. It will never occur to the viewer that they are in fact apart of the view themselves, not literally of course, but in some deeper sense, and in fact, our modern use of language deems such integral unity as, in some way, unthinkable, as in ‘not-thinkable’ or ‘not possible to be thought of’, not so much because of the idea’s novelty or absurdity, but more so because the way of life which leads people to view the world as unified simply doesn’t exist anymore. As much as modern experience may lead one to assume that all spheres of life are fragmentary, it is fact impossible for this to be the case, Berry writes that humans are no more outsiders to Creation than any other thing, this is a ‘uni - verse’ after all. 


And naturally, if humans do really believe they are separate from the rest of the world, that can only lead to feelings of anxiety, Berry writes about mankind, ‘He ought to be anxious, because he is helpless’, with the implicit assumption being that he is helpless because he is a specialist, and in doing only one thing, does virtually no thing. 


Berry certainly raises some good points, but, thinking in terms of practicality at least, I can’t see how I can be anything but a specialist in today’s world. It’s really impossible to imagine a life where I’m obligated to fulfill most of my own needs, much less the needs of others. Ultimately, Berry seems to be viewing the past ‘generalist’ lifestyle through something like rose tinted glasses, sure there are upsides, but it’s very possibly the case that such a lifestyle was much worse in some ways than what we got now. I can only guess though, it seems we’re too far down the ‘specialist’ track to turn back now, so I’ll never really know. 


Although, now that I think about it, maybe there's an analogy here to what that old man was saying. If I’d consider the whole of my legs, not just the front of them, I’d realize that I’ve neglected training the back of them, and will thus heed his advice and train them as well. That’s one way of being more of a ‘generalist’, I guess, not as radical as an entire lifestyle change, but better than nothing. 




4 Kudos

Comments

Displaying 3 of 3 comments ( View all | Add Comment )

Gluma

Gluma's profile picture

Oooo, I like the transition from typical personal-blog-life-update to an interesting discussion on specialization (and then bringing it back to your personal life at the end) :O! I really like your writing and how this entire blog was formatted! Reminds me of how a teacher would write (in a good way; you explain concepts very well haha)

I think the specialist vs. generalist topic is pretty interesting; it kinda reminds me of the cultural differences between Western societies (focusing more on individualism) with Eastern societies (focusing more on community) and the pros and cons of living in either society.
I will say, I very much agree with Berry’s point on how specialization creates a selfish viewpoint on one’s life. As an American, I know of many personal examples where this individualistic mindset leads to many people not caring about others, whether that’s about the others in the future or even others in present times (ex: “Why should I care about global issues when they don’t directly involve me?”). I mean, my “solution” to this problem isn’t that everyone should suddenly start focusing on being a generalist but it’s pretty much what you wrote in your last paragraph: small realizations that you can, indeed, focus on more than one thing and see the benefits of looking at the big picture. If we’re gonna decide on how people should live their lives, I do personally believe that indulging in many areas of life is an overall good thing but it wouldn’t hurt to focus on a certain aspect more than the rest ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ variety is good but I’d be pretty unhappy if I forced myself to never take the extra time in doing things I actually like

anyway this was really well.written and I liked reading it!!


Report Comment

Vivid_Hut_64

Vivid_Hut_64's profile picture

Great first blog post! I really like your voice in your writing and thought it was a great read. I hope you post more!!


Report Comment



Will do boss don’t you worry 👍

by catreadingabook; ; Report

CrashingCalamity

CrashingCalamity's profile picture

You’re too humble this was a great read! I like your comparison of a simple life experience with your reads. I’d love to read more!

Is a generalist a “jack-of-all-trades”? Someone who’s okay at everything? Or is a generalist a person who indulges themselves in all hobbies and experiences but never pushes themselves beyond the beginner stages of those hobbies?


Report Comment



To be honest I’ve kind of extrapolated a bit on a what Wendell Berry wrote about, his essays are almost solely concerned with critiquing his conception of the ‘specialist’ society, in the interest of comparison, I provided the example of the ‘generalist’ to complement what Berry wrote. I imagine he would say that a generalist is, at bottom, someone who can do more than one thing, perhaps like a jack of all trades, but maybe more like someone who’d we consider to be ‘self-reliant’, someone like the old ideal of the farmer or huntsman, something like that.

You can catch hints of that old American idealism in the way Berry laments the modern way of life, one would suspect he numbers among his heroes the classic pioneers like Daniel Boone and Davy Crockett, the ‘Manifest Destiny’ types, the ones who, as Tocqueville wrote, ‘...imagine that their whole destiny is in their own hands’. These men had to be acquainted with all areas of life to even get by, so they could hardly be considered ‘specialists’, at least in the sense that we’d use the word today. But, and this is perhaps a preview to a future blog post, this sort of ‘rugged independence’, which really defined American culture up until the end of the nineteenth century, will become pathologized into a distinct, uniquely American form of narcissism which found its perfect expression and partner in the ‘specialist’ society that developed alongside it. There is much more to be said on this, so stay tuned!

by catreadingabook; ; Report