Corrosion

Before you read, note the following people I follow (gives u better context) - Niccolò Machiavelli
- Friedrich Nietzsche
- Georges Bataille
- Gilles Deleuze
- Michel Foucault
- Nick Land <-- slight disagreement as he embraces accelerationism without control, I do
- Mark Fisher
- Nick Srnicek Corrosion is imminent; metal corrodes, everything old corrodes, corpses, plants, metal, they all corrode. A corrosion of the structure is imminent, and soon, we've seen countless times how ideologies have corroded and eroded, Marxism, fascism, feudalism, they're all gone from the main scope of politics, and it has corroded to the point any modern follower is just a clown with a mask, liberty has prevailed and the end of history has been proclaimed. No. It hasn't, liberalism is corroding, liberalism is dying and Fukuyama's End of History is nothing but a shallow pit not knowing the future we've been deemed and the past we've have been, liberalism has corroded all ideas since the end of the Cold War, modern day "Marxist-Leninism" is just a offshoot of liberal socialist practicies with a sense of militarization, modern day fascism is nothing but a more populistic and reactionary liberal movement, only holding racialist views and never giving answers on what their state shall mimic, this has lead to liberalism not only being an idea, but being a spectrum, you have left, right, authoritarian and more anarchistic liberals, we cannot escape it yet. So what is such corrosion?. Well, the liberal flaw is inevitable; something bad happens to the market, and people get affected. If people are affected, then other ideas of liberalism emerge and become popular. If we therefore have this endless loop in which theories other than a liberal one are taken, when will the corrosion start? Well, it would begin at the peak of the momentum. The peak allows for the movements against liberalism to erose itself, escapism is what people want, escapism is what the people shall get, while promises stay empty the promise of "political escapism" shall allow for a movement of people into the new movement, the reason we don't see these events happening or occuring is due to how they operate, disconnected, a connectivity inside the ideas and movement must occur, a Council must ensure such movement is kept alive, we've been this endlessly, the Petrograd Soviet, the Congressional Congress of the American Revolution and so on, these worked as it centralized their position, allowed for dialouge between the heads and the beggars to happen. Council ensures centralization and that's whats vital for modern-day changes to occur, Wall Street was a failure of the left, a failure in explaining their goals and a failure in centralizing itself with a proper leadership to give a meaningful response, no one talks about Wall Street cause it was a decentalized, conflicting failure from the non-praxis neo-leftism that has corroded the alternative left. Therefore, there is only one answer. If liberalism is already corroded and has taken itself to be the only idea in the political spectrum, we must change everything liberalism has touched. From the compass, the ethics and morals, everything must be changed, and a setup Council, a New Aristocracy based on the people, and to give what the people need must be ensured for Virtue to therefore exist as if the Council wins, liberalism dies.